PDA

View Full Version : Line 6 Toneport UX1


Surfcaster
06-12-2006, 10:31 PM
I picked up one of these a couple weeks ago basically because I was curious about it and was looking for a new toy. Also, it meets my requirements for something headphone friendly, since that's mostly how I get to play these days with 3-yr old and 8 week old daughters! Anyway, J&R Music World out of NY was selling the UX1 on-line for $100, when everyone else wanted $130, so I jumped on it!

For the most part, I'm pretty impressed with it. It's a scaled back version of the PODxt, PODxt Bass and also has vocal preamp models included, with a USB computer interface (and comes bundled with Ableton Live Light).

So far I've only played around with the guitar parts (which to be fair is mostly what I'll use it for, though I will likely use it to record bass tracks when I record my songs, and probably vocals, too, if I ever get inspired to write lyrics again!)

For its guitar modelling capabilities, my previous experience comes from a Yamaha DG-Stomp, Vox Valvetronix and V-Amp 2 (I still have V-Amp) and it certainly holds it's own...though like the rest it has its strenghts and weaknesses. The models represented are the more traditional models...Fender Tweed and Blackface, Marshall Plexi and JCM 800, Vox AC30, Soldano and Mesa Dual Rec, and then a number of high gain Line 6 originals (that I don't have much use for). I mostly use the Fender and Marshall models, but dabble with the Vox and Soldano, too. I don't like the Dual Rec model (though I haven't really liked this model on any of the modelers I've heard).

I really like the graphics...when you select an amp or effect the graphics resemble the actual amp or pedal...and in some cases they add optional controls on the side, in case you want to tweak parameters the original didn't have.

There are a number of cabs available as well, covering those you would expect with the respective models and a few popular additional options. I've enjoyed comparing the various Marshall 4x12s: 20W Greenbacks, 25W Greenbacks, G12T75s and V30s.

There are also 4 mic options...SM57 on axis and off axis and a couple condensers and it's interesting to see how different amp/cab combinations work with different mics and positions.

Each of the major effects are represented...Tubescreamer, Rat, Fuzz Face, Big Muff Pi, Chorus, Flanger, Tremolo, Compressor, Phaser, 4-band parametric EQ, Noise Gate, 3 types of delays and various reverbs. You can also select where in the chain some of the effects are placed.

It's pretty easy to make presets...and they are easy to alter as well. One disadvantage of the UX1 is that there is no ability to footswitch between presets...I think the UX2 would allow that, as well as switching effects on/off, etc.

There are some great tones in there and the ability to do some tweaking is there, too, but it's not so much so that you can get lost with endless tweaking (which is a good thing for me!)

I think it's a great learning tool...it could almost be used as a Primer on guitar gear. Sure, it's still "only a modeler", but it does give one an idea of how the different amps sound, how different cabs sound and how different amps respond to different cabs. You can get an idea of how different mics and mic placements affect your recorded tone. It's also a great way to understand how effects placement affects tone.

As for Abletone Live Light, it definitely has a learning curve for me who's never used computer recording software...and it's pretty limited...only 4 tracks. But I have a Boss digital 8-track that I can route the signal back to for recording, and I'll imagine that's mostly what I'll do. However, I want to learn more about programming the drums in Ableton, I'm hoping it's easier than with the Boss.

In the end, I still prefer the tone of my tube amps. But for headphone playing and silent recording the Toneport is a great option...in fact for those specific situations it excels...my Mesa F50 has a Headphone/Record Out jack, and that signal straight out of the jack is pretty lousy! So if I can't record with a mic I'll definitely use the Toneport...my Taylor sounded great through it, too.

SAguitar
06-13-2006, 01:59 AM
Thanks for the good review, Surfcaster. Nice and thorough. :cool:

dmock66
06-13-2006, 02:16 PM
Surf - do you think it's better/worse than the V-Amp II? I REALLY like the VAP - I'm not looking to change, just curious as to your opinion. To me, the only thing I'm missing with the VAP is the gain box models. I do wish it had that. However, by putting my pedal board in front of it I can accomplish what I want that way.

+1 on the good/thorough review!!!

Surfcaster
06-13-2006, 10:35 PM
Surf - do you think it's better/worse than the V-Amp II? I REALLY like the VAP - I'm not looking to change, just curious as to your opinion. To me, the only thing I'm missing with the VAP is the gain box models. I do wish it had that. However, by putting my pedal board in front of it I can accomplish what I want that way.

+1 on the good/thorough review!!!

Glad you guys liked the review...I was afraid it was getting too long! :???: Here's another long one!! :)

Compared to the V-Amp I think I prefer the Toneport on the whole. I've always found the V-Amp to be dark...most models seem bassy and I find that I can't quite get them as bright as I'd like...especially the Plexi models. The Toneport on the other hand is much brighter, which I prefer for the most part.

Comparing specific models:

Those I much prefer on the Toneport: Fender Bassman, Marshall Plexi & Jumpered Plexi, Vox AC30

Those I prefer on the Toneport, but not as strongly as above: Fender Deluxe Reverb, Roland Jazz Chorus

The jury is still out on the JCM800 and Soldano models...I like those on the V-Amp pretty well. The JCM800 seems almost too bright on the Toneport and the gain on the Soldano seems harder to control on the Toneport...plus I think both models have a tighter bottom end on the V-Amp 2. Though having said that I can get tones I like out of the Toneport for both of those.

Did I already say I don't like the Dual Rec model on either? I think I did...very spongy and very hard to control the gain...at least for me. But then I'm not a nu-metal kind of guy...80's metal a la Guardian is about as much gain as I generally need, and I can get that type of sound without using the super high gain models.

I've also found more desirable cab options on the Toneport. I was very disappointed that there was no Greenback cabs on the V-Amp, and no G12T75...at least that I could discern. The only cab missing on the Toneport that I would like to add would be a Marshall 4x12 with G12H-30s.

As you mentioned about the drive pedals...it is nice to have some options and specific models with the Toneport...and even nicer to be able to control the amount of drive, the tone and the level (if you want to use the pedal primarily as a booster).

I find that the effects on the Toneport on the whole are better than the V-Amp...with lots more control over the parameters. I mainly use chorus, delay and reverb, which are fine on the V-Amp, but I think they are slightly better on the Toneport, and the Phaser, Flanger on the Toneport are way better IMHO. One feature I really like on the Toneport is the assignable tap tempo delay...tap in your tempo, then assign the delay to anything from a 16th triplet to a whole note...waaaaaaaay handy! I've gotten used to a limited version of that on my Boss DD-5 and this is even more flexible and I love that! And the reverbs are really top notch...covers pretty much anything I'd want.

I still need to compare the results of recording direct between the two. I suspect I'll prefer the Toneport in the end, but the V-Amp has done okay there for me and I've heard some really great results from others using the V-Amp 2 who know what they're doing..

dmock66
06-16-2006, 03:02 AM
I had ten minutes this afternoon so I plugged into the VAP - there are some great tones in there, even if they never leave my headphones, I find them a blast to play. I guess at the end of the day, that's enough for me now.